HOME SEARCH RESOURCES CONTACT
 
Newsletters
 
 
CURRENT SEARCH
California Employment Law Notes
   

All Issues:
 
2008
November 2008
September 2008
July 2008
May 2008
March 2008
January 2008
January 2008
 
2007
November 2007
September 2007
July 2007
May 2007
March 2007
January 2007
 
2006
October 2006
August 2006
July 2006
April 2006
January 2006
 
2005
December 2005
October 2005
July 2005
May 2005
March 2005
January 2005
 
2004
November 2004
September 2004
July 2004
May 2004
March 2004
January 2004
 
2003
November 2003
October 2003
August 2003
June 2003
April 2003
February 2003
 
2002
December 2002
November 2002
September 2002
July 2002
March 2008
Download PDF Newsletter (74.16 K)
 
In This Issue:
 

Marijuana Compassionate Use Act Did Not Protect Employee From Termination
Ross v. Ragingwire Telecommunications, Inc., 42 Cal. 4th 920 (2008)

1
Employer That Failed To Make Directed Changes In 401(k) Plan May Be Liable To Employee
LaRue v. DeWolff, Boberg & Associates, Inc., 552 U.S. ___, 128 S. Ct. 1020 (2008)
1
San Francisco Health Care Security Ordinance Probably Is Not Preempted By ERISA
Golden Gate Restaurant Ass’n v. City & County of San Francisco, 512 F.3d 1112 (9th Cir. 2008)
1
Television Station Did Not Discriminate Against Caucasian News Anchor
Hicks v. KNTV Television, Inc., 2008 WL 585033 (Cal. Ct. App. Mar. 5, 2008)
2
NASA’s Employment Questionnaire Waiver May Violate Employees’ Privacy Rights
Nelson v. NASA, 512 F.3d 1134 (9th Cir. 2008)
2
Intake Questionnaire Filed With The EEOC Was A “Charge” Within The Meaning Of The ADEA
Federal Express Corp. v. Holowecki, 552 U.S. ___, 128 S. Ct. 1147 (2008)
2
Forfeiture Provision In Incentive Compensation Plan Does Not Violate California Labor Code
Schachter v. Citigroup, Inc., 159 Cal. App. 4th 10 (2008)
2
Talent Agencies Act Applies To Personal Managers As Well As Agents
Marathon Entm’t, Inc. v. Blasi, 42 Cal. 4th 974 (2008)
2
Employee’s Stress Resulting From Co-Workers’ Negative Reactions To Her Is Not Compensable
Verga v. WCAB, 159 Cal. App. 4th 174 (2008)
3
Social Worker Was An Employee Within The Meaning Of The FEHA And Was Sexually Harassed
Bradley v. California Dep’t of Corrections & Rehabilitation, 158 Cal. App. 4th 1612 (2008)
3
Former Employer’s Claims Were Properly Dismissed Under Anti-SLAPP Statute
Nygård, Inc. v. Uusi-Kerttula, 159 Cal. App. 4th 1027 (2008) 

3

Administrative Employee’s Overtime And Meal Period Claims Were Properly Dismissed
Combs v. Skyriver Communications, Inc., 159 Cal. App. 4th 1242 (2008)
3
Physician’s Discrimination Claims Were Properly Dismissed
Johnson v. Riverside Healthcare Sys., 516 F.3d 759 (9th Cir. 2008)
4
Non-Compete Covenant Was Not Too Broad To Be Enforced
Alliant Ins. Services, Inc. v. Gaddy, 159 Cal. App. 4th 1292 (2008)
4
Employer Entitled To Recover Its Attorney’s Fees In Discrimination Case
Villanueva v. City of Colton, 2008 WL 638269 (Cal. Ct. App. Mar. 11, 2008)
4
Resident Employees Need Only Be Paid For Time During Which Work Is Performed
Isner v. Falkenberg/Gilliam & Associates, Inc., 2008 WL 712045 (Cal. Ct. App. Mar. 18, 2008
4
 
   
  ^top