HOME SEARCH RESOURCES CONTACT
 
Newsletters
 
 
CURRENT SEARCH
California Employment Law Notes
   

All Issues:
 
2008
November 2008
September 2008
July 2008
May 2008
March 2008
January 2008
January 2008
 
2007
November 2007
September 2007
July 2007
May 2007
March 2007
January 2007
 
2006
October 2006
August 2006
July 2006
April 2006
January 2006
 
2005
December 2005
October 2005
July 2005
May 2005
March 2005
January 2005
 
2004
November 2004
September 2004
July 2004
May 2004
March 2004
January 2004
 
2003
November 2003
October 2003
August 2003
June 2003
April 2003
February 2003
 
2002
December 2002
November 2002
September 2002
July 2002
August 2003
Download PDF Newsletter (111.62 K)
 
In This Issue:
 

Employee Did Not Trespass By Sending Thousands Of E-Mails To Former Employer

Intel Corp. v. Hamidi

   
     

Employer Subjected To Threats Of Workplace Violence Was Entitled To Injunction

USS-Posco Indus. v. Edwards

   
     

Employer Did Not Violate Public Policy In Favor Of Self-Defense By Terminating Employee For Fighting

Escalante v. Wilson's Art Studio, Inc.

       
     

Employer Did Not Discriminate By Requiring Injured Employee To Use Vacation and Sick Leave Benefits

State of Cal. Dep't of Rehabilitation v. WCAB

   
     

Employee Who Failed To Report "Illegal Activities" Was Not Terminated In Violation Of Public Policy"

Rivera v. National R.R. Passenger Corp.

   
     

Employer Was Properly Enjoined Under The Unfair Competition Law

Herr v. Nestl‚ U.S.A., Inc.

   
     

Employees Should Have Been Paid For Time Spent Getting Into And Out Of Protective Gear

Alvarez v. IBP, Inc.

   
     

Attorney's Declaration That He Represented Employer And Employees Should Not Have Resulted In Disqualification

Koo v. Rubio's Restaurants, Inc.

   
     

City Is Not Liable For Actions Of Employees Who Acted Outside Scope Of Official Duties

Hoblitzell v. City of Ione

   
     
     

Settlement Agreement Did Not Bar Workers' Compensation Claim

Le Parc Community Ass'n v. WCAB

   
     

Workers' Compensation Act Bars Employee's Malicious Prosecution And Loss Of Consortium Claims

Mosby v. Liberty Mut. Ins. Co.

   
     

Employer's Anti-SLAPP Motion Against Employee Was Properly Denied

Du Charme v. IBEW, Local 45

   
     

Employee's Invasion Of Privacy Claim Was Not Barred By Workers' Compensation Act

Operating Engineers Local 3 v. Johnson

   
     

Union Employee's Discrimination, Public Policy Claims Were Not Preempted By Federal Labor Law

Smith v. IBEW, Local 11

   
     

Employee's Judgment Against Her Attorney For Malpractice Is Reversed

Jalali v. Root

   
     

Union Employees' Wage Claims Were Not Preempted By Federal Law

Adams v. Pacific Bell Directory

   
     

Good Cause Was Not Required To Terminate Independent Contractors Of Insurance Company

Appling v. State Farm Mut. Auto. Ins. Co.

   
     

Select Labor Commissioner Opinion Letters

   
     
 
   
  ^top