HOME SEARCH RESOURCES CONTACT
 
 
 
 
  SCOTT P. COOPER    
Phone 310.284.5669
scooper@proskauer.com
 
PARTNER
   
Picture of SCOTT P. COOPER

Press Room

In The News
Partners Notes
Painting Dispute To Be Arbitrated

Client Alerts
SEC Seeks to Better Protect Investors' Privacy
Feds Put Companies on Notice: Be Ready to Detect and Respond to Red Flags of Identity Theft
Updated January 2007: Michigan and Washington, D.C. Become the Latest To Pass Security Breach Notification Laws: Businesses Continue To Struggle with Various and Sometimes Conflicting Regulations

Press Releases
Proskauer Rose Announces 19 Lawyers Named in Southern California Super Lawyers 2009
Proskauer Rose Represents Anti-Defamation League & LGBT Centers in Historic California Supreme Court Ruling Striking Down Gay Marriage Ban
Proskauer Rose Announces 15 Lawyers Named in Southern California Super Lawyers 2008

Webinars
(REPLAY) Privacy and Data Security Law Update 2007

Speaking Engagements
Maximizing Returns On Your Intellectual Property Portfolio

View all SCOTT P. COOPER's Press Room Items

Los Angeles Office:
2049 Century Park East, 32nd Floor
Fax 310.557.2193

Practice Areas:
Antitrust
Alternative Dispute Resolution
Copyright
Commercial Litigation
Intellectual Property
Litigation
Trademark & False Advertising
International
France
Entertainment, Media, Information & Technology
Appellate
Internet Commerce
Non-Compete & Trade Secrets
International Practice Group
Education:
GEORGETOWN UNIVERSITY LAW CENTER, J.D., 1980
UNIVERSITY OF NOTRE DAME, B.A., 1977
 
Bar Admission:
01/15/1981 CALIFORNIA
 
Court Admissions:
1981 U.S. COURT OF APPEALS, THIRD CIRCUIT
1981 U.S. COURT OF APPEALS, NINTH CIRCUIT
1981 U.S. DISTRICT COURT, CALIFORNIA, CENTRAL DISTRICT
1982 U.S. DISTRICT COURT, CALIFORNIA, SOUTHERN DISTRICT
1983 U.S. DISTRICT COURT, CALIFORNIA, NORTHERN DISTRICT
1988 U.S. DISTRICT COURT, CALIFORNIA, EASTERN DISTRICT
1992 U.S. DISTRICT COURT, MICHIGAN, EASTERN DISTRICT
 
Biography:

Scott P. Cooper has been successfully litigating complex commercial cases for 28 years at every level of the state and federal courts, including the United States Supreme Court. Scott concentrates his practice in complex commercial litigation including antitrust, intellectual property and securities disputes. He has extensive experience in domestic and international business litigation involving a broad range of products, services, technology and proprietary information.

Scott has extensive experience in antitrust litigation. His cases have included the defense of cable company MediaOne Group, now a part of Comcast Corporation, in a cable Internet access antitrust class action in Los Angeles, representation of a motion picture exhibitor in civil antitrust litigation relating to the legality of motion picture distribution practices under federal and state antitrust laws, and defense of a prominent pharmaceutical firm in a purported nationwide antitrust class action. Scott also has represented clients in connection with state and federal civil and criminal antitrust investigations and grand jury proceedings, including the transactional counseling of clients.

Scott’s intellectual property experience is equally extensive. In 2000, he was one of the lead trial counsel in the landmark Digital Millennium Copyright Act victory on behalf of the motion picture industry in the Southern District of New York. That case of first impression involved the application of the anti-circumvention rules of the Copyright Act to Internet distribution of a utility for illegally decrypting DVDs. He also represented most of the major motion picture studios and the four major television networks in their technology copyright action against ReplayTV, the distributor of personal video recorders. He has handled disputes of all kinds affecting the entertainment and media industries, including financing, licensing and distribution, idea submission, rights of privacy and publicity, participation accounting and Guild residual disputes.

Scott represents domestic and foreign-based clients in matters in the U.S. and Europe involving subjects as diverse as transactions involving computer products, motion picture financing and licensing, as well as a wide range of issues relating to fine art. He represents, among other clients based outside the United States, the Republic of Austria and the Austrian National Gallery, on whose behalf he argued before the United States Supreme Court in February 2004, in a case of first impression involving the Foreign Sovereign Immunities Act.

 
   
  ^top